Cardiology Intensive Board Review Third Edition

Overall, it is a good book. Many topics covered are on the board. I would classify this as a high yield review book. Some answers are incorrect, but most people should be able to catch those mistakes.

I bought it to use prior to my MOC exam. It was useless. The questions have no resemblance to the exam questions. This book has many wrong answers and not up to date with the current guidelines. It seems that it was written by some fellows or by faculties who are not keeping up with the current cardiology literature.

Fantastic book

Good book

Very helpful. I recommend it.

In general the questions are good, but a lot of them are based on outdated guidelines (like bicuspid valve surgery with aortic aneurysms recommended at 5 cm rather than 5.5). I purchased this based on the most recent copyright date being 2015, thinking they'd have updated for the new recs, but this isn't the case. Keeping that in mind though, the majority of the questions are still good and the explanations are helpful in teaching concepts. This should NOT be your only source of review questions however.Update: The CAD section is just GARBAGE. So many of the questions have the wrong answer listed, contradicting the explanation. It's like there was no review of the section whatsoever.

What type of cardiology book published by the Cleveland clinic has multiple mistakes in its editing? Poor quality which reflects poor attending to detail which I hope does not reflect on how well the questions relate to the actual board exam.

great condition and good price