EMF meter

I get a feeling that people writing negative reviews about this meter are the ones who spent 3x the money on something else, and essentially got the same thing. I've wanted an RF meter for a while now, but I've always considered $150-200 way too much. I was surprised to find this one coming in at just under $50, and was an actual 3-field meter. The negative reviews were off-putting too, but I figured nothing ventured nothing gained and the potential upside if it worked as advertised was enough IMO. It does, in fact, work exactly as advertised. So how is it so cheap? My best guess as to the affordability: - No logging, so no EPROM - Non-replaceable battery means a simpler case design and a cheaper battery can be used. - Probably a cheaper IC chip, it has a slight lag of a little less than a second. Not an issue for me. - Micro-USB charging port and no included transformer = $$$ savings. - Cheaper EMF/RF sensor: This unit measures up to 8ghz, others 4x the cost measure up to 10ghz. I give props to these guys for realizing that manufacturing an RF meter at a price most can stomach, that will still measure almost everything you can think of, would mean selling to a broader base of potential customers. And the thing works great for $50!

First, you get what you pay for. This inexpensive (cheap) meter is great. It is moderately sensitive and fairly accurate. To get better sensitivity and accuracy you would have to pay 3 to 10 times as much. For the average home experimenter this meter is more than enough to provide indications of RF/EMI radiation. It can detect WiFi, Bluetooth, Ham Radio, CB, and microwave oven emissions. To the reviewer that claimed it wouldn’t detect his Bluetooth speakers: they are receiving the signal, try holding the meter near the device transmitting the signal. Overall, this is a great tool for the price!

This has a bright/easy to read display, and can measure RF, magnetic and electric fields. RF field--Seems to read a bit low for lower power level, less than about 5mw per square meter. For higher power levels, it seemed closer to what was expected, but still a bit low. Electric field--in a typical dwelling, we have a LOT of electrical wiring, and each wire radiates whether the switch/outlet is being used or not. This instrument seemsed very sensitive to Electric fields, and only needed to be within a foot or two of the wires before it detected them. Magnetic field--this seems to only work with alternating fields, such as from electical appliances. I brought it close to a strong magnet, and as long as I was moving the instrument, it indicated a field, but once I stopped moving, the reading dropped to zero. Appears to work as advertised, but instructions could have been clearer as to how this was intended for use.

So hard to believe that some people are so ignorant of knowledge, still think that stuff the MSM on the tv is pushing is so wonderful, well get this meter and scan the arm you got jabbed in when set on radio frequency and/or magnetic field.. you'll get a reading if you've been jabbed, hummmm... I wonder why that is..... this is how we find out if a patient has had this wonderful procedure and if they did we show them the door because of the liability of treating them.. That's how much your so-called leaders, MSM, medical establishment care about you.

I was only expecting to use this tool once or twice but I pull this out of my toolbox and use it on a regular basis. Very good at identifying issues wit EMF. I was shocked to see how dangerous my microwave over is and what a safe distance is to stand form the microwave.

Don’t bother. It worked for an hour or two, then stopped working. Won’t charge or turn on again. Terrible product.

I bought this meter to check the radiation I may expose daily. So far, tested a couple things. The meter is insensitive and inaccurate. Blue tooth speaker: I got it as a Christmas gift. Surprisingly, the reading is always zero after double check a few times, you can see from the video. Looks like something wrong with this meter. Cell phone tower: I brought the meter to a cellphone tower in a park (my kids like to play there), the RF reading is around 0.06 mw/m2, seems this area is pretty safe. My friend has an Acousticmeter, pretty solid. I borrowed, took to the same park to compare/verify. I am shocked that the Acousticmeter reading is around 10 to 40 times higher than this Poniie meter, that certainly is a red flag. For example, the reading is 20mw/m2 vesus 0.6mw/m2. Double checked and tested for a couple of times, the same. It is always much lower than the Acousticmeter. Peak Value and Average value: Strangely, the peak value of Poniie meter is pretty much the same or very close to the average reading, the average reading is 0.06mw/m2, the peak value is also 0.06mw/m2. The reading of this meter is not trustable, it is significantly lower than real RF radiation value. If trust this meter, the dangerous area becomes safe area. Battery: the fully charged battery only last for about two hours, not 8 hours like the manual states. Also, if the battery goes bad, it cannot be replaced. Then you have to purchase a new meter. I will return this meter and buy another one which can accurately monitor RF.

It works, but wtf does it all mean? It came with a couple of small pages of instructions. I'm not a rocket scientist, so I don't understand much. It does tell you the amount of EMF coming from everything. Scary AF. Maybe I can find something on line to actually explain what exactly the numbers mean. It is a cool gadget.

Herramienta muy util, facil funcionamiento, sin ser profesional cumple su objetivo