Nikon D750 FX-format Digital SLR Camera Body

I have owned a number of SLR and D-SLR cameras and have found a perfect match to my needs in the Nikon D750. I won't get into a comparison of brands - each brand has its merits. I chose the Nikon family because many of my original film SLRs were Nikon and I wanted to get even more use out of my lenses. My first Nikon D-SLR was the D90, followed by the D7100. I loved both, the D7100 even more so (which is fair, given that it had several upgrades to the D90). The D750 is everything I've been waiting for. For a full-frame camera, it is very reasonably-priced. The photo quality is excellent - with good lenses, the images are sharp and the colours are beautiful and accurate. Low-light photography is amazing - I am continually stunned at how sensitive the sensor is and how minimal the noise is at high ISOs. I've used the camera for everything from fast-moving action shots (sports, auto-racing) to meteor showers and everything in between, including portraits and nature photography. Images enlarged to poster size retain their sharpness and detail. I have greatly enjoyed the photo quality of the D7100 - it's a great DX camera that I highly recommend if you're looking for DX. Sorry, you can't have mine because I'm keeping it!:) I was eager to do some side-by-side comparisons with the D750. Using the same lens, I took photos with each camera and, while pleased with the results of each, the photos from the D750 were exceptional. Much of the difference is likely due to the full-frame sensor and simply having so much more image to work with, but I was also impressed with the outstanding clarity in low-light conditions which is surely a result of the updated CMOS. I took some ambient outdoor photos during the last full moon using a tripod and was stunned by the detail in the D750 images. And the photos of the full moon itself were astounding - they were so clear and detailed, I wouldn't have been surprised to see an astronaut waving to me. :) The D750 has many features I've been longing for. - the tilt LCD is fantastic. I sometimes shoot using a monopod to get an angle above people's heads and the tilt LCD allows me to see what I'm getting. I recommend a wireless remote (Nikon or the AmazonBasics) or Nikon MC-DC2 remote release cord. - the built-in Wi-Fi has made it infinitely easier to go from camera to smartphone/tablet without needing to pull SD cards out of the camera and use a computer. With the Nikon WMU app on your smartphone or tablet, it takes only seconds to transfer images that you can then further proof, email, or post to social media. I've transferred images in 1-2 seconds each. You can also take photos on the D750 from your smartphone or tablet. (Be sure you have a fully charged battery to get the most out of the experience so you can have Live View appear on your device.) I recently shot photos for a competitive event and people were amazed at both the quality and the speed of the photos I was posting to Twitter. Within seconds of taking a photo on the D750, I could have the image posted to social media. - Speed! 6.5 fps can capture a lot of action, especially combined with the advanced auto focus features. I've been able to capture some amazing moments. - Face recognition - HD video is really fun and the quality is amazing! Even though the camera has reasonably good autofocus for video, I do recommend using manual focus if only to avoid the noise form the auto-focus (if you're using an external microphone, which I recommend, this isn't as much of a consideration). Most of the video I've taken has been in inherently noisy locations, so the autofocus noise is barely discernible and can be easily removed in post-processing if desired. - Dual memory card slots are super convenient! I got spoiled by this feature in the D7100 and love that I can set it up so that raw goes on one card and JPEG on the other, or have an automatic backup, or even set it up for overflow so I never have to worry about filling up a card right before that vital shot. ~ A couple of additional notes ~ LENSES: Like many photographers, I tend to find that lenses can have a greater impact on the quality of my photographs than the camera itself. It had been my intention to purchase a full-frame camera ultimately, so I ensured that my lenses were FX, even when I had DX cameras. This made the eventual upgrade to FX a much easier transition because I had lenses to choose from. (The DX lenses will work on the FX cameras, but the sensor will only shoot as though it were DX, so it's not taking full advantage of the FX sensor. The FX lenses work on the DX cameras, so it's a good long-term strategy to invest in FX lenses even if you have DX bodies.) Invest in the best possible lens you can afford, even if it may mean waiting to get a better camera body later. RAW/NEF: the raw (NEF) format has been updated, so you'll need to get an update to your image-processing software. (I use Adobe Photoshop CC and the current update is able to correctly process the NEF format.) MEMORY CARDS: Be sure to get high quality memory cards that have a Class 10 rating. This is the write speed. Given how fast you can take photos and video with this camera, you'll appreciate having memory card that keep up. My personal favourites are SanDisk Extreme Pro (32GB or 64GB) that have a write speed of 95MB/s. They are also shockproof and waterproof. "FLARE" - you may have seen reviews where people mention a problem with flare. Although this seems to have affected a very, very small percentage of the original D750 and only under very specific conditions, Nikon has made a correction, so any D750 you buy now will not have an issue. If you happen across an older one, Nikon will fix it.

Looks and functions like NEW. Moving up from a D7000. Much more premium. Dials turn smoothly and are chunky rubber. Will take some time to get comfortable with the slight change in button layout. The jump in image quality is quite noticeable. My D7000 does not handle even slightly low light environments very well. ISO gets very rough at only 400 or so. The D750 is lightyears better. This will greatly open up creative possibilities and opportunities. I can’t wait to dive in. I’ve wanted this camera since its release. I’m so happy to finally own it.

Let me start off by saying that I am not a pro photographer, meaning I haven't ventured into "selling" my work. I would consider myself an enthusiast instead; I understand the basics of photography and read about the technology that drives the equipment. I don't take a purely artistic/creative approach, instead I like to see my photography as somewhere between documentary/event and photo-journalistic. These days, most of my photography takes place indoors, mostly in the evening hours, in poor lighting (probably the three least conducive variables to capturing light.) The lenses I've used to take such photographs consist of the Nikon 70-200 f2.8 VRII, Nikon FX 50 & 35 f1.8, and Sigma 18-35 f1.8. The photographs consist of portrait style, and group/candid shots. The other half of my photographs are of a similar style, but the subjects are hardly static (think action sports; actually I'll just tell you: indoor rock climbing.) I was using a D7200 with the above lenses and was getting mostly great results; depending on how poor the lighting was, my biggest obstacles were accurately attaining and maintaining focus and keeping high ISO noise to a minimum while freezing the action. For example, the candid and portrait shots I could shoot between f1.8-f2.8, 1/60-1/125s and stay at around ISO800-1600. For the action shots, I would have to be shooting f2.8-f4 at 1/200-1/250s with VR-ON (slows down focus acquisition, especially during bursts) and anywhere from ISO1600-6400 (in 1/3 steps), though I think most of those shots fell at 3200 and higher. At this point the noise would start to creep in and while I could apply NR in post, I would lose lots of fine detail in cleaning up the image. Since I do not get paid for my time, I shoot mostly in JPEG and strive to get correct exposure and WB in-camera. I do not have time to mess around in LR6 editing each RAW file (tangent: I started this hobby taking lots of pictures of my baby daughter and after 6 months or so, I have over 3,000 RAW files, mainly of my daughter, taking up over 92gb of hard drive space. Probably only 10% of those pictures would benefit from RAW post processing and in retrospect I would have saved a lot of time and space shooting in JPEG). This is where the D750 eliminates most of my problems. I had read lots of reviews and when the latest, hyped cameras come out, sometimes the reviewers can make some pretty lofty statements (forgive them, if you were a camera geek you'd be pretty stoked too). I also looked at the "scientific" performance of the camera, and while I am NOT a pixel peeper, nor a Brick Wall Analyst, the results I obtained from using the D750 and high quality glass had me doing double-takes. What I mean is, this camera did AMAZING things when it came to my two primary concerns: focussing action in low-light and high ISO/low-light noise management. I was zooming in to my photographs because I was so blown away by how well this camera performed compared to the D7200, and I just couldn't believe it. I have straight-out-of-camera shots (albeit, of my wife in our dim fluorescent lit living room) taken at ISO12,800 (Fine, JPG, High ISO NR-Normal, ADL-Auto) with my 50 f1.8 and they look FANTASTIC. Speaking from memory --so this could be a bit hyperbolic-- the shots taken on the D750 at ISO12,800 look just as good (if not better) as shots I've taken at ISO6400 on the D7200 (same settings and lens). From this, you can extrapolate that if you shoot mostly in outdoor/good light, or don't need high ISOs, your pictures will be EVEN BETTER. I somewhat regret not buying the D750 before the D7200 because while the D7200 is a great camera, and does really well in High ISO situations, the online reviews were just not able to articulate the difference in High ISO performance between the two cameras (while at the same time praising how well the D7200 performs in low-light) when I was deciding which camera to purchase so now I have to sell it for a loss. Other benefits I have noticed over the D7200 (or FX vs DX): - the bokeh (subject isolation) is appreciably better on the D750. - the ergonomics of the D750 are quite similar to the D7200, but a few rearranged/shifted buttons here, thicker grip there, all lead to a more comfortable experience. I use Back-button focussing for action, and although they shifted the AE/AF-L button a few mm to the left, I find this more comfortable than it's placement on the D7200. I am 5'4" with rock climber hands (still size small in blue nitrile gloves, though) and I found the D750 grip to be much more comfortable than the D7200. Folks with larger hands will probably find the same to be true. The D7200 was comfortable only if I slapped on the extended grip, because I would finally have room for my right pinky finger. The weight isn't really an issue; I use a nice strap (OP/Tech or Joby, depending on the lens.) - the tilting screen seems nice, though I have not found myself needing it so I taped the bottom of it to the camera body so that it would not accidentally open. To me, it's just another point of possible mechanical failure. - video capabilites: haven't used them, and don't know much (nor care) about what it offers, but Nikon seems to be pushing this feature-set. - quality of the rear LCD: same as the D7200, as far as I can tell. It's got 1200k dot resolution as compared to the 921k resolution of the D610 and lesser DX (and older FX) bodies. Bottom line - it's sharp and I like it. To summarize: If you shoot primarily indoors, or in low-light, or need to freeze action indoors and in low-light, and have good glass (f1.8-f4 max. aperture) GET this camera if you can afford it (the D610 I've read also performs similarly, however I like the ergonomic/button feature-set the D750 adopted from the D7100 and D800) If you shoot outdoors, in good light, still, landscape or street photography, and don't make a living with it, you can save yourself a lot of money by not getting this camera, and instead getting the D7100, D7200, or an even less expensive DX body and using the savings on better glass (any of the Sigma Art primes, or the Sigma 18-35 which I am very upset that I will have to sell since it's a DX lens.)

Para quem o uso principal é na fotografia, e não precisa de resolução maior que 24 megapixel, é a melhor câmera no mercado ainda hoje. Não digo melhor custo/benefício, é a melhor, mesmo! Agora, para quem vai fazer muito vídeo, embora ela o faça com ótima qualidade, existem câmeras mais novas que superam a D750 nesse quesito, inclusive a D780, sua substituta na linha Nikon. Como o manuseio, armazenagem, backup, transferência, etc de arquivos acima de 30 mega começa a ter um custo considerável, considero seus 6016x4016 pixels uma excelente medida, pois permite uma impressão com tamanho considerável (cerca de 50 x 35cm a 300 DPI) sem precisar de consumir muitos Terabytes para armazenamento.

good camera

De las mejores compras que he hecho una gran cámara excelente hizo calidad de imagen me ha acompañado a muchos eventos. Realmente es una gran cámara para los que aún piensan comprarla. Vale la pena cada peso.

Ho comprato la macchina unitamente all’ obiettivo 24-120. Arrivata in giorno prima. La confezione conteneva anche un carica batteria e una asd 8gb. La macchina è in ottime condizioni come l’obiettivo. Fatto fare una pulizia del sensore per togliere qualche punto di polvere che si sarà spostato nel trasporto. Unica nota stonata la batteria ancorché testata dal venditore alla spedizione non funziona. Pronte la risposta del venditore. Nel complesso al momento 4 stelle per il solo disguido della batteria

Pantalla arañada...diales encendido y rueda puñp muy duros