My 60 Memorable Games Paperback – April 7, 2009

I got this book, primarily to see the killer Rf6 tactical shot against Pal Benko. Back when i first started out, i thought he gave up his rook for nothing, but now I saw what fischer was up to. The f7 pawn is blocked and cannot go to f5, and if the rook is taken, fischer would play e5, with the unstoppable mate on h7 to follow. Unless nakamura proves me wrong, i doubt another American will win the world title again as nakamura threw away a couple draws against Vidit at the candidates in toronto earlier this year, and missed out by half a point. Fabi threw away the win when he missed an opportunity to win nepo's passed pawn and missing out on forcing tiebreaks vs gukesh.

arrived... excellent shape!

My husband and son are really enjoying working through the games in this book. At first it looked too advanced to be helpful for new chess players, but they tried it and it worked for them. They are learning a lot!

Hm...When I first decided on aquiring this literary masterpiece, I was quite under the impression that there would be a higher annotation:move ratio. I was wrong, but perhaps that is a good thing.There is a plethora of chess enlightenment within the pages. Knowledge isn't spoon-fed to you, as in many lower-level books, but there are excellent annotations which let us peek into the mind of a chess legend. A chess legend whom, if you are reading this page, you probably adore.The games are ones which Bobby Fischer considers memorable, so therefore they must be pretty great, right? They are!Still, as I mentioned, the annotations aren't spoon-fed to you, so you won't be getting anything out of simply playing over the moves really quickly and glancing at the annotations. You actually have to sit in front of Fischer's opponent and contemplate the moves through Fischer's eyes.C.S.Purdy once said,"If the student forces himself to examine all moves that smite, however absurd they may look at first glance, he is on the way to becoming a master of tactics."I quote him, because, a lot of Fischer's moves come out of nowhere. When going over Bobby's games in endeavor to guess which move comes next, calculating the bizarre moves is beneficial.It's an excellent book if you are a dedicated chess player. Casual chess players won't get nearly as much out of it. In other words, if chess is your hobby, you won't get as much out of it. If chess is your life, then stop reading customer reviews, and just go ahead and purchase the book!

Very instructive, even amusing at times. His analyses of possible lines are impossible to follow without playing them out on the board, at least for mortals like me. Can he really see that far ahead? I guess a world champion can. The position is shown fairly often, so it's easy enough to keep up while playing through the games, and it's fun to think, "What would I do?" We even agree, once in a while. I prefer the notation for the moves in Alekhine's book, where they used capital letters for the pieces instead of the little pictures, which don't show up very well on my old Kindle, but are fine on my Samsung phone. A very good book for the chess student or fan.

This book is a necessary addition to the library of anyone and everyone who is a fan of Bobby Fischer. This book is a must have for anyone who is serious about improving his chess performance.

Great classic from a great world champion. The weird thing about this book is that sometimes you feel like are not learning a thing and then years later one of his thoughts jump out at you in the middle of a match and you think that is what he meant wow! Also his love of the history of chess comes through and he even quotes Lasker and restored Lasker's treatment of the Ruy Lopez. This from the guy who onced said that Lasker's style was no better than a club player! Go figure....Anyhow arguably the best annotated chess book ever written even if at first glance it does not seem so. Fischer's words will come back and knock you upside the head when you least expect it. If I have only one complaint it would be he does not explore the beauty of his positions and his elegant solutions to the problems he faces althought he does hint at this when he calls one of his openings ugly. So why not read the best from the best (my opinion sorry Elo).

Good