Nikon D7200

Needed an upgrade after my d3400 broke and after plenty of research decided upon this model and was sceptical at first but glad I went with it. Brilliant pics, brilliant battery life, sturdy. Was delivered a week before delivery date, even after I got a phonecall stating that was an unexpected delay (showed up on the sat after ordering on the wed) well packaged and everything in the box. Highly recommended. My only issue is that the grip is not as deep as the d3400 so fingers hurt abit after awhile, especially given the weight.

A really nice camera and a good deal used. If you go used, you can get the D7500 for about $200 more. I don't know if the new D7200 is a US or "grey market" camera; I bought mine used. I don't think the D7200 is made any more although there are new units available apparently. Note that the D7200 seems to be more money new than the D7500. If you want to buy new then I say get the D7500. Things I like about this camera (D7200) vs D7500 1. Works with old manual focus AI-S lenses (a big deal for me as I have some very nice old Nikkor lenses). 2. Two SD card slots (7500 only has one). 3. Depth of field preview (on the D7500 live mode does show depth of field however) 4. 24 MP (megapixel) sensor while the 7500 has a 20 MP. What I like about the D7500 (I also have a D7500 I bought new) 1. Faster continuous shooting 2. Touch screen 3. Tilting screen 4. I like the control placement a bit better 5. Has the same sensor as the pro-quality Nikon D500. If you want to "shoot the moon", the D500 is probably the best DX format DSLR Nikon made (or perhaps ever made period). There are new and used Nikon D500's available new on Amazon (the D500 is no longer produced). For what you pay for a new D500, a used full frame FX camera starts to become attractive. But FX lenses are bigger, heavier, and more money. It's worth researching whether or not you might want to go for a FX set of gear instead of DX. The D7200 is a great value used and will leave you with some cash to put towards a nice lens. My used D7200 was very clean with no obvious signs of wear. It did need however a rubber eye cup (not all accessories are included). However, if you want to buy new, the D7500 is a better deal unless you like the features on the D7200 better.

Vengo de una D5000 luego salte a una D5200 y creí que era el momento de saltar a otro nivel aunque full frame me atraía el precio estaba fuera de mi presupuesto asi que la D7200 fue la elección perfecta no me arrepiento en lo mas mínimo es una gran cámara mayor velocidad calidad excelente a ISO más alto, controles y cuerpo de una full frame, motor de enfoque hasta ahora e realizado grandes fotografías y me veo un tiempo mas con esta gran cámara, se las recomiendo.

Produto com otima qualidade e entrega perfeita.

Met my expectations, great piece of gear!

I did a lot of research before deciding to purchase the D7200, so I knew exactly what I was getting. When it comes to cameras and lenses, I highly recommend that you do the same as well. Every photographer's needs are different, and every camera is different. So, you'll need to consider your budget, what you are shooting, what your future plans are, and your current lenses before making a choice. The D7200 is a highly capable DSLR and I cannot go into all its features here. What I will try to do is explain why I chose the D7200 over its newer siblings in Nikon's DX lineup, and hopefully that will help make your choice clearer. The D7200 is perfect for my needs. I wanted a camera that offered me enough control so I could experiment in any way I wanted to. It needed to be reliable and rugged. It needed to be capable enough to let my creativity go wild. While not as rugged as the more professional Nikon DSLRs, the D7200 checked all the right boxes for me. I chose it over the D7500 because I really wanted the dual card slots. For me, the other improvements the D7500 offered could not justify the additional cost of the newer body. The other camera to consider is the D500 (if you are looking for DX cameras), but that was beyond my budget. The money I did not spend by going for one of the more expensive cameras, I spent on a better 70-300mm lens. I shoot still life, children and landscapes most of the time. The D7200 gives me everything I need for these scenarios. The sensor is sharp and the resolution amazing, and as I found out, can bring to light any deficiencies in your shooting methods. It really forces you to learn how to improve technique if you want super-sharp images. I find this a welcome challenge, but others may not. I paired the body with a Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G Lens with Auto Focus for Nikon DSLR Cameras . For a medium zoom, after much agonizing, I finally went with the Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM FLD Large Aperture Standard Zoom Lens for Nikon Digital DSLR Camera . Lastly, I added the new Nikon AF-P NIKKOR 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6E ED VR f/34-8 Fixed Zoom Digital Slr Camera Lens, Black for a tele zoom. The reason I spent the extra money for the FX version of this lens instead of the much cheaper DX version is because the FX version includes a hardware VR switch. In the DX version, VR can only be controlled from the body, and the D7200 does not offer that control so you can never turn the VR off. This may be an issue in situations where you do not need VR, so I spent the money saved on the body here, on the better lens. The D7200 is a great camera, and with the current discounts, I highly recommend getting a new body before they go out of stock. Unless you are a pro who needs the super-fast continuous shutter speed and tougher body of the D500, or someone who prefers a larger sensor FX camera, the D7200 will not in any way stop you from capturing the images you envision. However, if video is your primary focus, the newer bodies may be a better choice. I highly recommend Thom Hogan's Complete Guide to the Nikon D7200 and Steve Perry's (of Back Country Gallery) Secrets to the Nikon Autofocus System (for any Nikon DSLR) to help you get the most out of the sophisticated tool that the D7200 is. These books are available directly from the authors' sites.